LaggerMet wrote:ROCKYBALBOA wrote:Match(5928): Guns N’ Moses vs. Stiff Wind
Result: 0-1 (0-1)
Guns N’ Moses Lineup: LaggerMet () - P4ER () - Yannex () - Musonda1 ()
Stiff Wind Lineup: PiperSalvia () - Gilbert () - ROCKYBALBOA () - Catrice ()
Goals:
First half:
0-1 | 7:50 | ROCKYBALBOA ()
Second half:
No goals
Notes:
Full game replay:
https://thehax.pl/forum/powtorki.php?na ... 999c56d5f7gg
PiperSalvia. CS
i just want to note that catrice heavily breaks the 3-def rule
examples:
2:25
and from 18:00 until the end
Hi, i think first position is not a violation because he(P4ER) lost his control. I watched again last 20 seconds. 18.06 is not a violation because you are 4th man.But you are right for 18.18. He hit the ball in there because he could enter while playing 2(gk)-2(am-st). he interpreted 3def rule differently(i will explain below). If there is a violation there is only 1 position. this violation can not affect for the match result. I'm sorry if it's a violation, but it's not a big violation and he played clearly along 13 minutes 55 seconds.
Now i want to write for 3 def rules. 3 def rules are very clean for me. St can't block dm in attack zone but st can block gk.
Rule: Once three attacking players have entered the 3def-zone, it's position is defined by the third most forward attacking player:
Yes, you are both(3rd man and 4th man) and st can block 4th man. But he can't block 3rd man. the rule is complicated and I think a new descriptive rule should be added for 2-2 attack system. You can inform me if I know wrong.
Note:sorry for grammer mistakes