alternative def rule

Talk about haxball in here, maps, sides, players, tactics, anything related to the game.

Re: alternative def rule

Postby rolex » February 13th, 2014, 11:10 pm

jalapeno wrote:The things that are stopping this idea from being tested out are peoples attitudes and their limited intelligence.

If this idea didn't come from someone like me; the outcome could have been way greater.


u stop posting right there bro. fm would never discriminate its members and u are a very rude person to assume that and insult our intelligence.

i have reported ur post. enjoy ur ban
  • 3

Spoiler: Show
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image


Image
Image
Image
User avatar
rolex
Betting Mod
 
Posts: 1207
News Articles: 6
Reputation: 683

Joined: January 29th, 2012, 12:00 am
Location: london blud


Re: alternative def rule

Postby Zizou » February 13th, 2014, 11:17 pm

Go change the world somewhere else.
  • 0

User avatar
Zizou
 
Posts: 452
News Articles: 0
Reputation: 49

Joined: September 23rd, 2011, 11:00 pm

Cup Runner-up: Season 2

Re: alternative def rule

Postby Maddude » February 14th, 2014, 3:26 am

Reason why curve is better than line: The reason I prefer a curve is because generally better plays happen from the dm being in the center and they are always further back once it gets too the middle. Also it allows the start of the curve to be nearer to the corner allowing the fwd to snap up any shitty pass backs or lesser powered clears that go down the line.

From what I saw of people playing on the map in the tournament the majority of fwds didn't take advantage of the line and still stayed nearer to the half-way line, the whole point is you can get involved at a certain point and you're not really helping otherwise.

A possession rule like naho's proposed is good and yes it does clear up the attacking gk rule. You guys just need to give things a chance, which is the problem with haxball, lots of stubborn immature people who complain about one thing but then don't want to change it once an idea is proposed. gg.
  • 0

Co-Founder of Feed Me Community!
User avatar
Maddude
Elder of da Realm
 
Posts: 2406
News Articles: 4
Reputation: 1127

Joined: July 23rd, 2011, 11:00 pm
Location: South Coast

Position: Goalkeeper
Division 1 Winner: Every time except once
Cup Runner-up: Never
Division 2 Winner: Just the once
Cup Winner: Every time

Re: alternative def rule

Postby SebastiAn » February 14th, 2014, 6:45 am

Maddude wrote:Lots of stubborn immature people who complain about one thing but then don't want to change it once an idea is proposed.


The idea is bad. And is the majority complaining of the current 3 def rule? I don't see that happening.
  • 0

User avatar
SebastiAn
 
Posts: 120
News Articles: 0
Reputation: 130

Joined: August 29th, 2012, 11:00 pm
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Position: Forward

Re: alternative def rule

Postby DoCtoRé » February 14th, 2014, 10:51 am

When the blacks were segregated and used as slaves there was originially only a minority that were complaning - This does not hide the fact that their is a problem - In this case with the currect interpretation of 3 def man rule - And just because you are not complaining doesn't automatically remove the problem.
Their is a problem as outlined by naho's post, maybe you should ought to read it more carefully and then give a better input to this thread.
  • 0

Image
User avatar
DoCtoRé
 
Posts: 235
News Articles: 1
Reputation: -33

Joined: April 1st, 2012, 11:00 pm

Division 1 Winner: Season 4

Re: alternative def rule

Postby mlfaijati » February 14th, 2014, 4:13 pm

Who the fuck mentioned blacks you monumental spastic.
  • 1

FM record:

G.I. Joehans:
[s]Won Div 2 and Cup[/s] Got carried by Fritz.

ARRIBA!:
Got carried by jonny then disbanded the team.

NWA:
Came like 6th in Div 2B then disbanded the team.

The Real Rocknrolla:
When the going gets tough...

ACDP:
Benchride to title!

Overall:
A travesty.

User avatar
mlfaijati
 
Posts: 828
News Articles: 2
Reputation: 82

Joined: February 15th, 2012, 12:00 am
Location: North London

Position: Defensive Midfielder
Division 2 Winner: Season 4
Cup Winner: Season 4

Re: alternative def rule

Postby dora da gora » February 14th, 2014, 4:37 pm

#neslon mandale
  • 0

Image
User avatar
dora da gora
 
Posts: 875
News Articles: 3
Reputation: 270

Joined: February 7th, 2012, 12:00 am


Re: alternative def rule

Postby Fred » February 14th, 2014, 5:00 pm

i think the current rule i completely fine.
  • 0

Image
User avatar
Fred
 
Posts: 239
News Articles: 0
Reputation: 140

Joined: February 11th, 2012, 12:00 am
Location: Belgium


Re: alternative def rule

Postby killa » February 16th, 2014, 12:20 pm

tbh I can still score with 4man in defence, doesn't matter
  • 0

User avatar
killa
 
Posts: 269
News Articles: 0
Reputation: 29

Joined: September 17th, 2011, 11:00 pm

Division 1 Winner: Season 2
Cup Runner-up: Season 3

Re: alternative def rule

Postby jalapeno » March 17th, 2014, 1:26 am

:l
  • 0

Last edited by jalapeno on June 30th, 2014, 8:41 pm, edited 2 times in total.
:thumbup:
User avatar
jalapeno
 
Posts: 142
News Articles: 1
Reputation: 759

Joined: November 28th, 2012, 12:10 am

Division 1 Winner: Season 5

Re: alternative def rule

Postby Rénbeaudach » March 25th, 2014, 11:05 am

Image
  • 1

User avatar
Rénbeaudach
 
Posts: 476
News Articles: 3
Reputation: 647

Joined: September 20th, 2012, 11:00 pm
Location: Lancashire

Division 1 Winner: Season 99

Re: alternative def rule

Postby rolex » March 25th, 2014, 10:26 pm

Image
  • 0

Spoiler: Show
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image


Image
Image
Image
User avatar
rolex
Betting Mod
 
Posts: 1207
News Articles: 6
Reputation: 683

Joined: January 29th, 2012, 12:00 am
Location: london blud


Previous

Return to General Haxball Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests