I guess if the game had more than 100 players Whitee would not come close to being an admin but due to the circumstances he is. I take the word of an admin for fact when he is communicating with both teams but this is wrong as an admin should not be responsible for their actions?
- Everything you say is kind of irrelevant considering that you weren't here until very late in the evening
"very late in the evening" = 21.40 when you had a game at 21 and you had 6-7 players on teamspeak.. You failed to suggest us a specific time which is why I opted for that approach.
- "you can choose a random 40 min period to log in to, demand to play and then leave exactly when we come"
There was no "random time" we gave you a 50minute window as a substitute for not being given any time from your team. This is extremely reasonable from us as you had never suggested a time to us yet we still decided to give you a flexible time period to play in which we waited all throughout and this was clearly communicated to you on the forum.
- "(which you did, I offered a date to play in a reasonable time, you offered a date to play very very late in an unreasonable time)"
The date you offered was the 31st of October (The last matchday) so you don't really earn much plaudits for that and no time was even offered so I don't know how that qualifies as a "date to play in a reasonable time" as you have described. I think it obvious to anyone that a 50minute window after you had just played a match and all your players are online is undoubtedly much more reasonable than just offering a day with no times... It's obvious English isn't your first language so maybe you should sign a translator
- "wait for them to log off in the deadline day (which is bound to happen because we can't just sit 24 hours and wait for guys who will maybe show up and maybe not)"
Nobody had logged off from when I posted on the wildcard thread this can be checked I'm sure on the teamspeak logs if necessary.
- "I purpose the only reasonable solution, defwin to GNM, and punishing (at least a warning) CF for playing dirty tactics. Our team is made of busy people, we aren't professional haxballers, we really can't deal with such bullshit every time it happens."
As we can see here he has resulted to using an ad hominem when he realises the lack of an actual argument he has. Your team is indisputably more active on this game than ours but this is not the matter we are discussing

. Thankfully you are not an admin as you favour making decisions without any logical thought process.
Now onto Whitee

-i didn't say any specific time to you splat, i tried to make both teams play to avoid defwin/defloss situation since it was last day to play, lagger told me that they are not 4 when i asked them to play but then lozano joined ts and lozano said that he can play in 15 min, so i told splat that "maybe" gnm can play in 15 min if everyone is here from them, gnm had 4 players available at 22.40 cet and wanted to play but splat didn't want to play because gnm rejected splat's host.
Only quality that this guy has as an admin is that he is online 24/7. I must say I have to respect his time commitment as without it the league wouldn't run as smoothly as it does. Without a doubt however if the game was still small with maybe 700-800 active players? he would never be an admin. He is unable to do anything objectively, he has always operated with a bias to whoever treats him better; as an admin being objective and doing what is the right and fair over everything else should be the most important but as he has demonstrated time and time again that he is incapable of this but this is the result when the prospective pool of admins is so small I guess so hard to complain as he does try his best it is not his fault he is just unable.
- i didn't say any specific time to you splat, i tried to make both teams play to avoid defwin/defloss situation since it was last day to play, lagger told me that they are not 4 when i asked them to play but then lozano joined ts and lozano said that he can play in 15 min, so i told splat that "maybe" gnm can play in 15 min if everyone is here from them,
If this is the case that you said "maybe" could we have a screenshot of that chat? You copy pasted me a message saying 10-15 minutes that was all which we were content to wait for as it was in the aforementioned time period.
- gnm had 4 players available at 22.40 cet and wanted to play but splat didn't want to play because gnm rejected splat's host.
Both pieces of information provided here are false. They joined our room at 22.43 when we had just 3 players as one had just left.. so it was now impossible for us to play then, it was nothing to do with the host. I understand that he could leave as we were waiting 50minutes for a team that didn't want to play and wanted to try and get a defwin. Imagine giving a 50minute time frame to then come 15minutes late and then complain about my team

Hope we can come to a reasonable resolution, we would prefer to just play the game if at all possible. I can't blame Whitee as he is just doing the best with what he has
