¿BIG O BIG EASY?

Fukin essay time
tl;dr - Basically big/big easy for the league.
I used to be really on the side of big but after playing big easy it really is just better. Whole point is that no1 rly cares about FM anymore coz its just YeS 2.0, although that would be implying that it was better which it really isn't.
For and Against for big easy:
For
There isn't any big easy leagues around that would give western European players decent ping as far as I know (I could be wrong) so if you want to expand the league then making it unique.
If you have good players then Big Easy is the better format as tactically it has a superior metagame and it just demands more from the individual.
It would mean we would suck less at the CC.
It would stop having to use an artificial rule (3 man def) which has to be taught to upcoming players.
It's a nice change to keep everyone interested, we've had 3 ssns of 4v4 big and we had 3 of 3v3 before that, seems like the natural progression to me.
GK's now aren't disabled priks and would have to actually do something (unless ur hannes and u stay behind halfway fukin el)
GOTW wud be better coz bere passing and shit.
Against
Most of us suck too much to play Big Easy well, and it then descends into a horrible spam match.
You would have to change something that works and re-educate everyone on how to play.
What would we do for the cup?
What would we do for the 4v4 Champions League?
It would be really fuckin hard to find fs as YeS probs wouldn't change to Big Easy.
We also suck really bad.
We're pretty crap.
It would stop YeS teams from just migrating (or is that a positive?)
I realise this ain't all of the for/against but I'm bare lazy and i wna watch the football.
Don't judge if you haven't played Big Easy much or at all, I was on the side of Big until I actually started to play Big Easy properly, although I do admit it is only fun if you have good players.
JONNI CAN U MEK IT SO WE CAN C WHO IS VOTING WOT SO WE CAN PEER PRESSURE AND BULLY THEM KTHNX
dnt h8 me coz u aint me
#yolo
#$wag
tl;dr - Basically big/big easy for the league.
I used to be really on the side of big but after playing big easy it really is just better. Whole point is that no1 rly cares about FM anymore coz its just YeS 2.0, although that would be implying that it was better which it really isn't.
For and Against for big easy:
For
There isn't any big easy leagues around that would give western European players decent ping as far as I know (I could be wrong) so if you want to expand the league then making it unique.
If you have good players then Big Easy is the better format as tactically it has a superior metagame and it just demands more from the individual.
It would mean we would suck less at the CC.
It would stop having to use an artificial rule (3 man def) which has to be taught to upcoming players.
It's a nice change to keep everyone interested, we've had 3 ssns of 4v4 big and we had 3 of 3v3 before that, seems like the natural progression to me.
GK's now aren't disabled priks and would have to actually do something (unless ur hannes and u stay behind halfway fukin el)
GOTW wud be better coz bere passing and shit.
Against
Most of us suck too much to play Big Easy well, and it then descends into a horrible spam match.
You would have to change something that works and re-educate everyone on how to play.
What would we do for the cup?
What would we do for the 4v4 Champions League?
It would be really fuckin hard to find fs as YeS probs wouldn't change to Big Easy.
We also suck really bad.
We're pretty crap.
It would stop YeS teams from just migrating (or is that a positive?)
I realise this ain't all of the for/against but I'm bare lazy and i wna watch the football.
Don't judge if you haven't played Big Easy much or at all, I was on the side of Big until I actually started to play Big Easy properly, although I do admit it is only fun if you have good players.
JONNI CAN U MEK IT SO WE CAN C WHO IS VOTING WOT SO WE CAN PEER PRESSURE AND BULLY THEM KTHNX
dnt h8 me coz u aint me
#yolo
#$wag