TehBeast wrote:Originally the 3 def rule was designed to prevent players from 'obvious' 4 deffing. Nowadays it seems like some strikers try to find the limit to where their actions are considered as 4 deffing. This brings up the discussion of where the limit when 3 deffing becomes 4 deffing is. It's imppssible to include very seperate situation in the rulebook which gives us two options: make the rules more specific (e.g. the ST is not allowed to touch the DM at all when the opponents are in attack) with clear consequences for players who violate the rule. The second option is to proceed with these rules and we stop complaining over every small incident.
I think this explains it pretty well. I talked with MrP about those 4defs and we came also to the point that some situations were a bit over the limit (
https://imgur.com/a/cuhsK ).
Nowadays, strikers try to find the limit and abuse it as much as possible, that's what I'm doing. I noticed that Edi purposely walked into my model a few times because I pressured him too much. I know there were a few touches, but at this point I refer to the reaction time of a normal human. 2 or 3 touches were small touches which had no influence on the game and I obviously moved away immediately after this happened. Yes, I'm sticking to the DM's ass and yes, touches happen but they mostly have no influence in the game itself.
/// @StingerBell
Defwin because you need the points? I could counter-claim your team for using macro on your meisterpenguin aka Edi. You've nothing to claim right here.
//// #edit:
You claim that the ST was closer to def than the AM? That was the situation where your GK went to attack and thats when 4def is actually allowed.