StringerBell wrote:
The league is still running after starting ages ago so i guess things are working even without a serious rulebook. Fair enough, I guess.
Herna wrote:@Stringer what's wrong with the rules?
The rulebook isn’t precise and it leaves room for everyone to interpret the rules however they want.
http://epvpimg.com/clWmcab In this area you're allowed to intercept whenever the dm loses possession apparently. How do you even decide whether the dm has possession or not? It’s highly subjective, basically the dm can go and defend whenever the defending side has the ball in their corner, since technically the attacking side doesn’t have possession, right?
As long as the ball is inside the attacking zone, the ST shouldn’t be allowed to interfere. This would remove every vague aspect regarding the rule(s).
Mish wrote:you want defwin? after when your player used macro and insulting on my players? cmon you cant be srs....
You have no proof of any usage of a macro, it’s absurd to accuse Edi of using it based on the sequences your team is referring to.
And what about your team? Multiple violations of the 3def rule and plenty of insults towards the opponents.
StringerBell wrote:Considering it was brought up so early and your team kept disregarding the rules, personally I think it should be defwin.
Thats just my opinion, though.
I didn’t watch the entire game, just the incidents that were brought up in this thread. If this kept going on for the entire game like this, you should with no doubt be rewarded a defwin. A striker shouldn’t gamble with the rules, the rules are there for a reason. Sure, there are no huge violations, it’s rather the quantity.
Allen wrote:i didnt watch the replay but if you say that there are a lot of 4def situations dont you think defwin/lose is too much? maybe just replay the game or something?
Replaying a game is bullshit, either the result should remain, or a defwin should be rewarded.