Feed Me Haxball

by **Guest** » January 10th, 2012, 2:22 pm

Pineapple

Ghost · by **Ghost** » January 10th, 2012, 2:29 pm

Done.

OvoXo · by **OvoXo** » January 10th, 2012, 2:36 pm

Noooooooooooooooo I wanted to sign Rachel -_-

socrates · by **socrates** » January 10th, 2012, 2:44 pm

OH FFS DONNY, IF SHE HAS A BITCH FIT AGAIN... ALSO SO MUCH FOR US NEEDING A KEEPER :/

by **Edgar Davids** » January 10th, 2012, 2:53 pm

How long until Soccerettes disbands because of Rachel?

Maddude · by **Maddude** » January 10th, 2012, 2:55 pm

Why would you do this?

Cathalio11 · by **Cathalio11** » January 10th, 2012, 3:06 pm

she is a keeper now

naby · by **naby** » January 10th, 2012, 3:06 pm

socrates wrote:OH FFS DONNY, IF SHE HAS A BITCH FIT AGAIN... ALSO SO MUCH FOR US NEEDING A KEEPER :/

Don't worry SCO <3

opc · by **opc** » January 10th, 2012, 3:20 pm

Good sign imo. At least she's active.

socrates · by **socrates** » January 10th, 2012, 3:52 pm

IMHO THIS IS A TERRIBLE SIGNING....QEZO MADE MORE SENSE THAN THIS
I BLAME BANKS :(

socrates · by **socrates** » January 10th, 2012, 4:19 pm

[16:14:20] @ Maddude : Haha soc you can just deny it...
[16:14:32] @ Maddude : And then it will be reversed

CHAIRMAN HAS BLOCKED THE TRANSFER!

Maddude · by **Maddude** » January 10th, 2012, 4:21 pm

Luld, might want to talk to your team.

But done.

George Best · by **George Best** » January 10th, 2012, 4:23 pm

Bizarre.

CircleBoy · by **CircleBoy** » January 10th, 2012, 4:57 pm

PMSL at how this thread turned out

naby · by **naby** » January 10th, 2012, 4:58 pm

gutting tbf :(

Soccerettes to sign Rachel.